I found after reading this article, that I am totally out of
touch with the elementary/secondary schools.
Since my children have grown and I teach college students I
never knew that reading and imagery went hand in hand. I really feel like a
fish out of water.
What I know about illuminated text and using pictures to
help a student read more proficiently is very miniscule. I do believe, however,
there is a place for illuminated text in the school. But not the way I just
learned it. I feel that if a child is having trouble learning to read, the
illuminated text of flashy words and letters zooming from one side to the other
would only confuse a student more. In the examples that were posted for us I
found the illuminated text ‘I carry you in my heart’ to be quite boring and if
I were having trouble reading, I would give up early. Where the example of the toothpicks,
‘Toothpick Ocean’ kept words moving along with images and I think this would
resonate better with the student. As Stated in our reading “We have noticed
that the strategic use of visual material can enhance reading experiences for reluctant
and low-ability readers and, indeed, can help them become more proficient
creators of internal visual imagery that supports comprehension.”( pg 759) I interpret
visual as meaning pictures, drawings etc. Where as, in the 1st paragraph
on page 762 titled ‘Illustrations in the text’, I feel that illustrated text
when used with pictures or drawings in addition to words would be an excellent tool in
the school. In fact I feel that one of my fellow student’s illustrated text
about FDR and the day of infamy would be an excellent example of this. It has
pictures and words and the speaker of those words. I was mesmerized by it.
You make some excellent points about the limitations of the Illuminated Text to support the mechanics of reading. Consider the power of Illuminated texts in creating an interest in reading or the power of students created Illuminated text to increase the comprehension of a poem or historical event. You are right that distinctions need to be made in this area. Like you I don't think teachers should spend time creating illuminated text to teach students the mechanics of reading.
ReplyDelete