Chapter 1: Media
Ecologies in Hanging Out, Messing Around and Geeking Out
1.
What
findings in the Media Ecologies: Quantitative Perspectives surprised you the
most? How does the finding change the way you think about young people,
technology and learning?
What I found most surprising
was the fact that according to the Kaiser report , media engagement did not
crowd out time spent with family, hobbies and physical activity. I found this
to be very interesting in light of the hype we see on TV about having 5 phones
in a house hold and they text each other across tables. I’m from a time when
color TV was invented and we still had rotary dial telephones and party lines.
I remember when the calculator was invented, my parents then claimed it would
turn our brains to mush. The family units started to become disjointed with the
need for both parents working or divorcing and having no time together. So it
seems to me that maybe media engagement is helping pull the family back
together. I think that the more I learn about this, I don’t think it should be
limited to just the young people. However, the world is their oyster and media
has so much to offer them. I’m a little jealous that I didn’t have this access
in my youth.
2.
What
are the benefits to a genre-based approach to understanding youth engagement
with digital media over a categorical-based approach?
As in all new
technologies, the powers that be want cookie cutter answers. Like No Child Left
Behind, the government tried to compartmentalize special needs students , only
to find there are a stunning amount of special needs. I believe that this is a
similar situation and the variables are staggering. Our text points out that
the genre-based approach emphasizing modes of participation, not categories or
individuals. They are looking at the variables that make the youth and the
technology unique, and looking at the forest and not trying to identify the
trees.
3.
What
aspects of Michelle's (Box 1.2) computer use at home have implications for
computer use at school?
I feel a showdown
approaching between mother and daughter. Michelle is a 12 year old or tween in
a strict home environment, where Mom does not want to let her go. The internet
has opened a whole new world for her. She loves the creative media course in
school because it gives her the freedom to express herself. Although I think
she is in a similar socioeconomic situation as her friends, she has more access
which can give her the edge in school.
4. As you read about Clarissa (Box 1.3) consider the
affordances of digital technologies that help Clarissa shape her identity and the role
they play in literacy engagement. Do you think there are positive implications
for these affordances in school-based literacy instruction? If so, what are
they. If not, what are your concerns?
I feel that there
could be positive implications for school-based literacy. Because story writing
could be beneficial in lieracy. However, my concern is how do you control who
they are talking to and writing and posting? To me the youth are not given enough
guidelines to follow. Free expression should be a privilege and not a
right. In the day and age these young
people don’t realize the implications of sharing passwords, and what they post.
Facebook and myspace have taken on a whole new meaning. Like writing in a
diary, when I was young, stories are made up or embellished. It was our world
and we could be anything that we wanted. Clarissa does the same but she puts it
out there for all to see in the program Faraway Lands. That to me is very bothersome.
5. In the section titled Messing Around we read
about the sophisticated and creative technology practices young people are
developing on their own outside of school. Do you think it is important for
teachers to know about and understand these practices. Why?
I absolutely believe that it is important for teachers to understand
these practices. It is important for them to keep up with the developing
technology. If we don’t understand how
students are already using digital media, how can we effectively make
assignments to enhance these skills? I learn a lot from my students. I find
myself ‘messing around’ and this actually leads gathering a great deal of
information without setting a specific goal. I have my students write research papers and
this leads to the students learning and not necessarily having prior knowledge
of a topic and they don’t even realize it. A few of my students will be
presenting their information at a conference in the fall. Part of our program
is on-line and we have the students experiment and ‘mess around’ and this allows
students to become real experts with new media and teach others. Especially me,
I am roaming out of my comfort zone
6. Should schools support students' in "geeking
out"? What are the educational and ethical implications of "geeking
out"?
When I hear a person called a ‘computer geek’ it makes me
think of people that know how to break the rules necessary to get a job done
and others want to learn. I feel the
schools should take advantage of their expertise and not negate their talents
simply because that person does not necessarily fit into a preconceived notion of
a ‘geek’. Educational implications would include learning how they find
credible information, but they also know the shortcuts and illegal downloading
could be a problem.
7. The young people studied for this book lived in urban
settings in California or New York City. Do you think young people in West
Virginia behave in similar ways and develop the same kinds of digital
literacies? Provide examples from your own experiences with young people in
West Virginia.
I believe the youth of the digital age are
basically the same all over the states and even the world. They all want to be
connected. The more money, the more toys. There are places in every state that
has areas of such poverty that braodband has not been installed until very
recently. I also believe that if the kids want it, they will figure out a way
to get it. Determined is the child that wants something reeeeally reeeeally
bad, life is not worth living without. The only experience I have with the
youth of West Virginia ,are my students, all over the age of 21. They bring
their iphones and ipads to class and listen to their ipods regularly. I had a
contest to see who could last the longest without their phone. I had them put
the phone in front of them and the first one to look at it had to leave the
room. They didn’t last a minute. For
that reason iphones and all i technology is not allowed during class. They hate
it.
I really like your connection between the genre based approach and educational policy like NCLB that tends to use categorical approaches! Of course I agree with your assessment!
ReplyDeleteYou raise really good concerns about Clarissa's technology use. The public nature of writing on the Internet is different than writing in your Diary where maybe only a sibling or parent could access it without permission. I think this is why it is important for teachers to show students how media circulates on the Internet and learn how to attend to audience and learn how to control what audience can access their work.
I'm impressed by your ability to take advantage of student's interest in "messing around" in your class! I do agree all the technology in the classroom can be a problem in terms of getting students to focus. It is possible to let students use their phones in productive ways in class. There is a site called Poll Everywhere where students can use their phones to answer questions or take quizzes during a lecture or presentation. However, like you, I do believe it is important for digital age students to learn to sit and focus on a speaker for awhile :)
I really appreciate your thoughtful and insightful responses to this reading!